![]() ![]() In addition, it will try to demonstrate the flaws present in Hart’s arguments. This paper will try to solve the controversy by defending Devlin’s arguments. The law is not supposed to interfere with the lives of people as a way of influencing behavior. The recommendations of the committee emanated from the principles of utilitarianism. The argument was that homosexuality should be made legal because of the freedom of choice and the privacy of morality. The debate was between Professor Hart and Patrick Devlin. The Hart-Devlin debate was an attempt to contribute to the findings of the Wolfenden committee. The report of the committee stated that it is not the responsibility of law to solve immorality. The Wolfenden Committee investigated the critical issue of allowing homosexuality and prostitution in society. The two represent two schools of thought regarding the matter. However, their views and suggestions contradicted each other and did present an agreement. Each of the two took a different side in an effort to establish the role that should be played by law with regard to morality. For instance, the Hart and Devlin debate tried to determine this relationship. Many debates have discussed the relationship between morality and law. The issue of law and morality is a complex matter that has been widely discussed in various fields including religion, law, and psychology. On the other hand, law refers to principles that augment and maintain the morality code in society. It also includes principles that define what is acceptable and unacceptable in society. ![]() Morality can be defined as a set of rules or principles that guide the process of making decisions and behavior in society. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |